Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

Link zu dieser Vergleichsansicht

Beide Seiten der vorigen Revision Vorhergehende Überarbeitung
Nächste Überarbeitung		 Vorhergehende Überarbeitung
en:theoretisches:diskussionsvermeider [2017-01-23 16:04] – Falkeen:theoretisches:diskussionsvermeider [2023-01-20 15:59] (aktuell) – [genesis, idea and usage] Falke
Zeile 16: Zeile 16:
 Basically everybody at our group is responsible of there own weapons and they get checked independently before and after each fight. At markets we checke each others weapons, because anyone can overlook something. There should happen no remarks at the final weapon check made by the organisators. Basically everybody at our group is responsible of there own weapons and they get checked independently before and after each fight. At markets we checke each others weapons, because anyone can overlook something. There should happen no remarks at the final weapon check made by the organisators.
  
-This tool is not meant as a control tool. The organizers of a training, the training partners check by eye and decide after their rules and their own discretion. The word of the organizer is binding, it is your place and rule As organizer you can use the tool to end a useless discussion or to show how a weapon should look like. It's less of a measuring tool and more an emphasis of your wod. +This tool is not meant as a control tool. The organizers of a training, the training partners check by eye and decide after their rules and their discretion. The word of the organizer is binding, it is your place and rule As organizer you can use the tool to end a useless discussion or to show how a weapon should look. It's less of a measuring tool and more an emphasis of your wod. 
  
-Until now I have only given away this tool namely to people who have shown that they want to observe the safety rules and promote the observation of these rules. +So far, I have only given this tool as a gift to people who have shown me that they comply with the safety rules and to those who also advocate for others to comply with safety standards. 
 + 
 +For those who also want to have this tool, there are two ways, to ask me or a little further down I have the 3D printable. Since recently, I also have a red card to distribute, More about this Here: [[:en:theoretisches:rote_karte]]
  
 ===== design of the tool ===== ===== design of the tool =====
Zeile 25: Zeile 27:
 How the tool is designed How the tool is designed
  
-{{:theoretisches:diskussionsvermeider_zeichnung.png?nolink|Technical drawing: Discussion-avoider}}+{{:theoretisches:diskussionsvermeider_zeichnung.svg?nolink|Technical drawing: Discussion-avoider}}
  
 I use the 8 mm radius at the head and beneath the head und unterhalb des Kopfes for speartips. The rules most often provide an area of 1 cm<sup>2</sup>. I prefer a bigger area of at least 2 cm<sup>2</sup>. This not least because a duplaction of the area means a bosection of theimpact force and therefore more freedom for me.  I use the 8 mm radius at the head and beneath the head und unterhalb des Kopfes for speartips. The rules most often provide an area of 1 cm<sup>2</sup>. I prefer a bigger area of at least 2 cm<sup>2</sup>. This not least because a duplaction of the area means a bosection of theimpact force and therefore more freedom for me. 
Zeile 35: Zeile 37:
 The cuts behind have defined thicknesses to measure sheet metal and egde thickness in the steps 1, 1.5, 2 und 3 mm. Depending on the rules 2-3 mm are mandatory. Here I also prefer thicker edges, as an enlargement means less impact force and such a bigger errror margin.  The cuts behind have defined thicknesses to measure sheet metal and egde thickness in the steps 1, 1.5, 2 und 3 mm. Depending on the rules 2-3 mm are mandatory. Here I also prefer thicker edges, as an enlargement means less impact force and such a bigger errror margin. 
  
-The tooths between the cuts have a defined thickness of 1.5, 2 und 3 mm. These measures are an aesthetical decision, but they can be used to compare thicknesses .+The tooths between the cuts have a defined thickness of 1.5, 2 and 3 mm. These measures are an aesthetical decision, but they can be used to compare thicknesses .
  
 The backbend exists solely for aesthetical reasosn to make the tool look more like a figure.  The backbend exists solely for aesthetical reasosn to make the tool look more like a figure. 
Zeile 41: Zeile 43:
 The tools are made from C60, so they can't be bend by accident, even if they are used to open a bottle or again somebody wants to show that his weaponsurely fits into the cuts (which is in no way desirable, as it would mean that the weapon doesn't conform with the rules :-) ) The tools are made from C60, so they can't be bend by accident, even if they are used to open a bottle or again somebody wants to show that his weaponsurely fits into the cuts (which is in no way desirable, as it would mean that the weapon doesn't conform with the rules :-) )
  
 +
 +===== Discussion avoider 3D print template =====
 +
 +Here is the discussion avoider as a 3D print template for use under Creative Commons license.
 +
 +{{:theoretisches:diskussionsvermeider_stl_ver1.2.stl?s=400|diskussionsvermeider_stl_ver1.2.stl}}
 +
 +<html>
 +<a rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/"><img alt="Pictogram: Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" 
 +src="https://licensebuttons.net/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />
 +Discussion avoider 3D print template from <a href="https://www.heydenwall.de" property="cc:attributionName" rel="cc:attributionURL">Heydenwall (Friedrich)</a> Is licensed under one <a rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 4.0 International License</a>.
 +</html>
 ===== How control is done ===== ===== How control is done =====
  
  • en/theoretisches/diskussionsvermeider.1485183874.txt.gz
  • Zuletzt geändert: 2017-01-23 16:04
  • von Falke